Cet article.
Version électronique
| La sociologie rurale et la question territoriale : de l'évitement à la réhabilitation par Jean-Paul Billaud |
5 € |
Version électronique : l'article est immédiatement accessible
en ligne en texte intégral.
Recevez des alertes automatiques relatives à cet article.
S'inscrire Alertes e-mail - Etudes rurales Cairn.info respecte votre vie privéeVous consultezLa sociologie rurale et la question territoriale : de l’évitement à la réhabilitation
AuteurJean-Paul Billaud du même auteur
Résumé
During the formation of rural sociology, it was important to examine the concepts for staking out this new disciplinary field. Among them, the concept of "territory" was "repressed" because it referred to a paradigm of rural life too close to the idea of a "community" with its implications of a homology between a social group and a spatial unit. This review of a seminar devoted to "space" in the late 1970s shows how the reluctance to use this concept by researchers who, laying a claim to Marxism, were critical of the Mendrasian approach amounted to a rejection of it, the "territory" being synonymous with a closed "rural object". Nonetheless, the concept of "space" enabled these same social scientists to raise the question of nature, while starting a new research program on questions related to the environment. Confronted with this new approach, rural sociology has rehabilitated the concept of "territory", but of a territory with groups of action and no longer tainted by the idea of a "social totality".
Mots clés
espace, interdisciplinarité, marxisme, paradigme rural, question environnementale, territoire
Ajouter au panier (5€)
Rural sociology and the territorial question: from avoidance to rehabilitationDuring the formation of rural sociology, it was important to examine the concepts for staking out this new disciplinary field. Among them, the concept of "territory" was "repressed" because it referred to a paradigm of rural life too close to the idea of a "community" with its implications of a homology between a social group and a spatial unit. This review of a seminar devoted to "space" in the late 1970s shows how the reluctance to use this concept by researchers who, laying a claim to Marxism, were critical of the Mendrasian approach amounted to a rejection of it, the "territory" being synonymous with a closed "rural object". Nonetheless, the concept of "space" enabled these same social scientists to raise the question of nature, while starting a new research program on questions related to the environment. Confronted with this new approach, rural sociology has rehabilitated the concept of "territory", but of a territory with groups of action and no longer tainted by the idea of a "social totality".
PLAN DE L'ARTICLE
- « L’espace » : un concept « mou » mais passeur
- De la communauté à la localité : le territoire « refoulé »
- De la sociologie rurale à la sociologie de l’environnement : le retour de la question territoriale




