Recevez des alertes automatiques relatives à cet article.
S'inscrire Alertes e-mail - Revue française d’études américaines Cairn.info respecte votre vie privéeVous consultezLe « nouveau paradigme stratégique » républicain
AuteurÉtienne de Durand du même auteur
Université Jean Moulin - Lyon IIIRésumé
With security experts so many and prominent in its ranks, the Bush Administration unsurprisingly came to power with a far-reaching strategic agenda. The project implies redirecting US foreign and security policy away from vaguely-defined objectives and undiscerning interventions. Practically, its proponents claim, it means acting more selectively yet more decisively, reducing US commitments and exposure abroad while enhancing its freedom of action and military power. On both accounts, this policy has fueled international and European resentment over “US unilateralism”. Strategic defenses are probably the most contending issue: while the Bush Administration considers the rapid deployment of missile defenses to be of paramount importance, many US allies see them as superfluous or, worse, destabilizing, not to mention great powers adamantly opposed to the project, such as China. Whatever the final decision, missile defenses are but a part of a grander scheme, supported by the proponents of the so-called “Revolution in Military Affairs”. Within that framework of technological and military dominance, missile defenses are closely linked to the protection of US space assets and therefore with the militarization of outer space.
Keywords
Missile defenses, Georges W. Bush, Security policy, RMA, Space
PLAN DE L'ARTICLE
- Le contexte, les idées et les hommes du nouveau paradigme
- « Faucons » et « Chouettes » : un Prince trop bien conseillé ?
- Le monde pris entre « (dés)engagement sélectif » et « primauté »
- « Missile Defense » : Achille et son bouclier
- Annales d’un échec répété
- Les systèmes projetés et l’argumentaire républicain
- La suprématie par le haut
- Les défauts de la cuirasse
- L’espace, envers du décor
- La Révolution est en marche
- Conclusion : « Guns but Butter »



