Critique internationale
Presses de Sc. Po.
I.S.B.N.2724630270
220 pages
p. 83 à 107
doi: en cours
Veille sur la revue
Veille sur l'auteur
Presses de Sc. Po.
I.S.B.N.2724630270
220 pages
p. 83 à 107
doi: en cours
Veille sur la revue
Veille sur l'auteur
Vous consultez
no 27 2005/2
L’État, l’économie et la protection sociale aux États-Unis et en Europe
Vivien Schmidt
US and European Market Economies
and Welfare Systems
State strategies toward work and welfare continue to differ, despite the fact that they have all moved down the continuum from faire (intervention) closer to laissez-faire . They divide into three main varieties: liberal, ‘enabling,’ and ‘enhancing,’ and are distinguishable not only by how far they have moved along the continuum but also by their mix of faire faire (state setting guidelines for market action) and faire avec (state action with market actors). Such differences are only partially explainable in terms of institutional legacies from the postwar period. Other factors such as economic vulnerability and policy preferences are significant. But most important are the political-institutional capacity to impose or negotiate change and the discourse that enhances such capacity. Using cases of advanced industrialized Western countries, the article demonstrates how different states’ trajectories of reform based on state strategies and mediating factors have been.
State strategies toward work and welfare continue to differ, despite the fact that they have all moved down the continuum from faire (intervention) closer to laissez-faire . They divide into three main varieties: liberal, ‘enabling,’ and ‘enhancing,’ and are distinguishable not only by how far they have moved along the continuum but also by their mix of faire faire (state setting guidelines for market action) and faire avec (state action with market actors). Such differences are only partially explainable in terms of institutional legacies from the postwar period. Other factors such as economic vulnerability and policy preferences are significant. But most important are the political-institutional capacity to impose or negotiate change and the discourse that enhances such capacity. Using cases of advanced industrialized Western countries, the article demonstrates how different states’ trajectories of reform based on state strategies and mediating factors have been.
• Explication de la persistance des différences :
stratégies, capacité politico-institutionnelle et discours
— Conceptualisation de la variabilité des stratégies étatiques
— Au-delà de l’héritage institutionnel :
le discours et la capacité politique des institutions
• La persistance des différences stratégiques
— Les stratégies étatiques libérales
— Les stratégies de facilitation
• Les stratégies des États « promoteurs »
© Cairn 2007
Vie privée |
Conditions d’utilisation |
Conditions générales de vente
À propos | Éditeurs | Bibliothèques | Aide à la navigation | Plan du site | Raccourcis
À propos | Éditeurs | Bibliothèques | Aide à la navigation | Plan du site | Raccourcis
Retour en haut de page
Ici s'achève le contenu de la page, la suite ne concerne que les attributs d'affichage