De la décentralisation à l’autonomie : la Guyane
Maude Elfort
While the regional reform of 1972 was carried out within the legal framework
governing public agencies, with competences limited to the field of investments, the
reform initiated by the law of March 1982 was quite different in that it put into place a
fully competent collectivity which, like departments, benefited from a general competence clause. How then, from now on, to divide competences between these two
collectivities ? In practice, the new division of competences between the two collectivities has brought about a fractioning of powers which is prejudicial to the ability of
citizens to identify the collectivity which is responsible. Moreover, the legal and financial
constraints continue to reveal the inadequacy of the current institutional framework. This
explains why in Guyana a new status is being called cining to transfer more
decision-making powers to a renewed local assembly. While originally a demand of the
Guyana Socialist Party (PSG) it has been taken up today by almost all political and
professional forces in Guyana.
• L’INADÉQUATION DU CADRE INSTITUTIONNEL ACTUEL
— Une région monodépartementale
— Des limites juridiques et financières
• VERS UN NOUVEAU CADRE INSTITUTIONNEL ?
— Le contexte social et économique
— L’avant-projet d’accord relatif à l’avenir de la Guyane