Accueil Revues Revue Numéro Article

Gestion et management public

2015/2 (Volume 3 / n° 4)

  • Pages : 120
  • DOI : 10.3917/gmp.034.0107
  • Éditeur : AIRMAP

ALERTES EMAIL - REVUE Gestion et management public

Votre alerte a bien été prise en compte.

Vous recevrez un email à chaque nouvelle parution d'un numéro de cette revue.


Article précédent Pages 107 - 122



The Republic of Korea has made major strides in Information and Communication Technology (ICT) over the last five decades. In 1960, Korea had a telephone penetration of 0.36 per 100 inhabitants, barely one tenth of the then world average. By 1981, Korea caught up with the world average. Now, Korea leads the world in broadband Internet access penetration. Korea is the leading example of a country rising from a low level of ICT access to one of the highest in the world.


Korea’s economic growth is often described as a miracle. Starting with a per capita income of less than US$100 in 1960, Korea averaged an annual economic growth rate of eight percent a year for the next five decades. By 2010, per capita income was US$20,000 and Korea’s economy ranked 13th in the world. The focus of growth has been manufacturing and exports. As Korea’s economy has matured, its manufacturing base has shifted from textiles, to chemicals, then machinery and later electronics. Today knowledge and information products and services play an important and increasing role in the Korean economy.


Korea’s emergence as the world leader in ICT – in field such as broadband Internet, semiconductors and third generation mobile and so on- it is not an accident. The government has specifically targeted this objective. It is no coincidence that the period of most intensive investment in broadband infrastructure corresponded with recovery from the worst effects of the Asian Financial Crisis in the late 1990s. Again it was because the Korean government specifically planned this, despite the general level of austerity imposed by IMF’s conditions for their assistance.


After going through continuous efforts in e-Government and national informatization, Korea has become one of the global E-government leaders - obtaining the highest scores in ‘E-government Development Index’ and ‘E-participation Index’. Korea’s Egovernment Development Index ranking assessed by the United Nations improved from 15th in 2001 to the top in 2010 out of 192 countries worldwide, and its E-participation Index ranking was also ranked 1st in 2010, 2012 & 2014(UN, 2010 ; 2012 ; 2014). In addition, many of Korea’s E-government practices until now have been introduced to the world as the best cases and received worldwide acknowledgement.


In addition, the level of Korea’s informatization is highly recognized by the world, as can be seen from the fact that Korea has ranked 1st for three consecutive years in ITU’s Digital Opportunity Index. The results of Korea’s e-Government services are selected as the best practices and their excellence is being acknowledged by the rest of the world. For example, with the e-Customs system called UNI-PASS that was established to complete an online export and import system for the first time in the world, Korea Customs Service won the WCO (World Customs Organization) Trophy in 2006 for intellectual property right protection with the fastest customs system among 169 member countries (MOPAS, 2008).


An e-Government initiative is recognized as a key strategic requirement for a knowledgebased society in the 21st century (Accenture, 2001 ; Deloitte Consulting, 2001 ; Gartner Research, 2002). Many governments including Korea are allocating resources to establish an e-Government. An Internet-based government service can deliver government services to citizens and private businesses more efficiently with broader access and cost savings across government agencies. As an information network, an e-Government can increase citizen participation in government to achieve an ‘open government’. The establishment of an e-Government will enhance national competitiveness.


Korea began to channel efforts into laying the foundation for an e-Government since the late 1970s. Through the Five National Computer Network project of the early 1980s, the Comprehensive Plan for Korea Information Infrastructure Establishment project, and the National Basic Information System project of the late 1980s, the Korean government established a high-speed communications network and stored vital government records-resident registration, real estate, and vehicle records - in a digital format to create the foundation for an e-Government.


The creation of an e-Government platform is necessary to keep ahead with the emergence of a new paradigm that will change government practices and services in the 21st century (OECD, 2003). An e-Government will play a key role in expanding national competitiveness (NPR, 1997). An e-Government initiative is the most effective citizen-centered system available to meet the needs of citizens and private businesses and will provide quality and faster government services. The government will become more transparent, effective, and accountable through an e-Government service and will expand the use of information technology among citizens and private businesses (OMB, 2001 ; NAO, 2002).

1 - e-Government initiatives in Korean


Korea’s informatization began in the late 1970s, when major administrative business processes were computerized in the areas including resident registration, real-estate and vehicles. In the 1990s, the focus of informatization shifted to unit-based or function-based processes such as those for passport patent and procurement administration.


Between 1992~1994 when the government structure was in a transition period from totalitarian government to congressional government, the interest in IT development by President Kim Young-Sam has somewhat diminished but in with the launch of Information Superhighway Project in USA in 1993, the government solidified its will once more by newly establishing the Ministry of Communication (MIC) and through High Speed Broadband Network Project. During 1998~2000, right after the Asian financial crisis, President Kim Dae-Jung’s interests were focused in restructuring of 4 major sectors to recover from the economic crisis and therefore, the president’s interest in egovernment project has lowered but from 2001, the president’s will and interest solidified the e-Government Project as the strategic enabler with highest importance for government innovation (NCA, 2002). The history of e-government promotion in Korea is outlined in table 1.

Table 1 - History of Korea e-Government ImplementationTable 1

From 2001, it was about building a government-wide infrastructure for e-Government, for which 11 initiatives and 31 roadmap projects were implemented. The e-Government promotion led to enhanced efficiency of public administration by stabilizing electronic processing of government work, and improved economic feasibility, expertise and security of government resource management by constructing government-wide data centers and integrating government information systems. Moreover, it led to reduction of document submission for civil service application by a large extent and increased convenience and participation of citizens in policy-making by providing portal services for civil application or enabling interaction with public offices without having to visit these offices in person (MIC, 2002).

1.1 - Kim, Dae-Jung Administration (Jan. 2001 – Feb. 2003)

1.1.1 - Vision & Strategy


The Korean government established the Special Committee of e-Government on January 30, 2001 in order to promote interagency collaboration in negotiating issues concerning the e-Government initiatives. The Special Committee for e-Government was established as a special committee under the Presidential Commission on Government Innovation, which is an executive branch committee.


Therefore, the Special Committee for e-Government reports to the president as anindependent body. [3][3] The main structure of the Special Committee for e-Government...


The Special Committee for e-Government proposed a vision and strategy in May 2001, as follows :

Table 2 - e-Government Vision & Strategy of Kim, Dae-Jung AdministrationTable 2
(Source : SCEG, 2003b)

1.1.2 - e-Government Initiatives


The below mentioned areas are the basic framework for an advanced e-Government and core businesses for various ministries. Therefore, if these initiatives were fully implemented, it was expected not only will the people and companies benefit from the system, but also the transparency and accountability of the Korean government will be significantly enhanced.

Table 3 - 11 e-Government Initiatives in KoreaTable 3
(Source : SCEG, 2003 : 13)

President Kim Dae-Jung held a meeting for the ‘Report on the Completion of e-Government Infrastructure’ on November 13, 2002 with all ministers from each participating ministries in attendance. President Kim announced that 11 major e-Government initiatives were successfully executed and declared the opening of full-scale e-Government services (SCEG, 2003). Therefore, the Special Committee for e-Government was dissolved as of January 31, 2003.


The successful completion of the 11 e-Government initiatives were bring many changes to how the government operates and have a positive impact on citizens and private business. The inefficient use of the budget and human resources that were allocated to outdated procedures and functions have been reduced substantially. Efficient government services were boost productivity of private businesses and lessen the burden on civil servants who will no longer have to process redundant procedures. The level of national competitiveness was increased in the long-term due to these e-Government initiatives.

1.2 - Roh, Moo-Hyun Administration (Feb. 2003 - Feb. 2008)

1.2.1 - Vision & Strategy


The Korean Roh, Moo-Hyun was elected in the 16th presidential election on December 19, 2002 and sworn in as President on February 25, 2003. The Roh administration established the Presidential Committee on Government Innovation and Decentralization (PCGID), its mission is to make the government of Korea more open, transparent, and closer to the people. With full support of the President, the PCGID has changed the way government works and transformed the government into an open, transparent, accountable and participatory government for the people.


The PCGID consists of the main committee, and five executive committees : Administrative Reform Committee, HR Management Reform Committee, Decentralization Committee, Fiscal/Tax Reform Committee, and e-Government Committee. The PCGID proposed the vision and strategy of e-Government of Roh, Moo-hyun administration in May 2003, as follows (PCGID, 2003a) ;

Table 4 - 11 e-Government Vision & Strategy of Roh, Moo-Hyun AdministrationTable 4

1.2.2 - e-Government Initiatives


Upon his inauguration in 2003 President Roh prepared policy measures to further develop national informatization and e-government projects promoted by previous administrations. To promote government innovation in a more comprehensive and systematic way, the Presidential Committee on Government Innovation and Decentralization (PCGID) was established to deal with such issues as e-government, administrative reform, local decentralization and tax reform.


In 2003, the ‘Roh Administration e-Government Vision and Principles’ was announced, followed by the ‘e-Government Roadmap’. The e-Government Roadmap is composed of four areas of innovation, 10 agendas and 31 projects as shown below in table 5.

Table 5 - 31 e-Government Roadmap Projects in Roh, Moo-Hyun AdministrationTable 5

The e-Government Roadmap projects present grand ambitions for achieving the national vision and goals of Korea, which include (1) the realizing of a participatory democracy, (2) establishing balanced social development, (3) promoting the era of Northeast Asia, and (4) achieving a per capita income of USD 20,000. In so doing, the goals of e-government have been set ; innovating service delivery, enhancing efficiency and transparency and promoting democracy in administration, coinciding with the vision of achieving the “World’s Best Open e-Government” (PCGID, 2003b).

1.3 - Lee, Myung-Bak Administration (Feb. 2008 - Feb. 2013)

1.3.1 - Vision & Strategy


Lee, Myung-Bak administration has actively pursued e-Government as a crucial means to make its government more competitive, by leveraging the world’s best ICT including broadband Internet. The Lee, Myung-Bak administration proposed a vision and strategy of IT Korea in September 2009, as follows :

Figure 1 - Vision and Strategies portrayed by the five future strategiesFigure 1

1.3.2 - e-Government Initiatives


The Lee, Myung-Bak government in the second advanced stage formulated the <National Informatization Basic Plan> (2008~2012) in December 2008 and the <Smart E-Gov Plan> (2011~2015) in March 2011. The Lee, Myung-Bak government organized a work group, Informatization Promotion Working-Level Committee, for the National Informatization Basic Plan in the early 2008. The work group first analyzed the megatrends, the informatization plans of each ministry, and the government agendas to select the activities of the national informatization. The vision, goal, and direction of the national informatization were determined based on the result of analysis. Also, the work group conducted the demand survey of whole central administration agencies, citizen, and system integrators. As a result, the five areas, twenty one agendas, and seventy two informatization activities were chosen. Among them, the e-Government project is the fourth area, “knowledge government which works well” which consists of four agendas and nineteen activities (MOPAS, 2010a).

Table 6 - 19 Activities in the National Informatization Basic PlanTable 6

The Smart E-Gov Plan was formulated in 2011 to convert the PC-based e-Government into the mobile e-Government with the use of mobile devices such as smart phones and tablet PC (MOPAS, 2011). In this plan the smart government was defined as “The advanced government where the citizen freely use public services regardless of the type of medium by combining the advanced information technology with government services and which is being improved through the participation of and the communication with citizens.”

1.4 - Park, Geun-Hye Administration (Feb. 2013 - Present)

1.4.1 - Vision & Strategy


The Park, Geun-Hye Administration embraces Government 3.0 as a new paradigm. The notion Government 3.0 goes beyond what the technological potentials of Web 3.0 promise, as shown in Figure 2. The Park administration envisioned Government 3.0 for the purpose of building a new age of hopes and happiness for all Koreans. The Korean Government 3.0 drive seeks for two high level goals : providing services customized for and tailored to various needs and demands, and creating new jobs and reboosting development engines. For these two goals, the Korean Government presents three strategic directions : service oriented government, transparent government, and better (and smarter) administration (in other words, competent government). All these efforts are supported by four core values such as openness, sharing, communication, and collaboration.

Figure 2 - Vision and strategy in Park, Geun-Hye AdministrationFigure 2

1.4.2 - e-Government Initiatives (Government 3.0)


Figure 3 describes the details of three categorized strategies for the Government 3.0 drive. First, Government 3.0 is a strategy for service-oriented government. NIA [21] considers Government 3.0 as a pack of lowcost but high-quality services for customized citizen happiness. The Government 3.0 drive personalizes public services adjusting for individual needs, supports entrepreneurialism and businesses, enhances more efficient and effective access to public information and services, and customizes citizen services through using new technologies.

Figure 3 - Strategies and Tasks in Park, Geun-Hye AdministrationFigure 3

For that, the Korean Government establishes consolidated systems to provide information and services integrating across public agencies, policy domains, and geographical jurisdictions. These systems enable services based on lifecycle, services adjusted for specified beneficiaries’ needs, and one-stop welfare services. The needs that Government 3.0 considers also include those of businesses and entrepreneurs. Especially, small and midsized businesses gain help from integrated services for economies. Service-oriented government seeks for multi-channel and anychannel services. This means more access points for those with otherwise limited access to information and services. Adopting mobile services for public services and information is gaining a promising vehicle for a new generation.


Second, Government 3.0 pursues transparency of government. Open government in terms of data and information means the transition from supply-driven transparency (reactive, responsive disclosure of public information) to demand-driven transparency (proactive sharing). According to President Park (see the news section of, Government 3.0 is intended to “make information sharing more equitable and transparent between the central government, local governments, government agencies and the public.” As well, information sharing can boost job creation and spur economic growth. Government-held data in such fields as weather, transportation and health care has considerable commercial value.


Government 3.0 is also about connecting with citizens and encouraging them to participate in public affairs. In particular, the government plans to consult with citizens, using online voting, on major state affairs and large-scale public projects costing more than 500 billion Won.


Last, better and smarter government specifies three directions : integrated (e.g., crossboundary, cross-organizational, cross-agency, and cross-departmental) administration, cross-boundary information sharing and collaboration driven by digitization and informatization, and scientific (data-driven) administration [13]. These strategic orientations require substantial improvements and also paradigmatic changes in public management and administration. Identified are the following three key words : collaborative administration, knowledgebased management, and data-based policymaking. While the previous two strategic anchors (service-oriented and transparent) are involved in the relationships with citizens, this means a fundamental shift inside government. For collaborative administration, the Government 3.0 drive transforms existing administration from typical bureaucracybased to task-centered, program-centered mechanisms. The latter necessarily requires cross-boundary collaboration. Smart work environment and cloud computing setting raise the level of information sharing and cross-boundary collaboration. With technological potentials, analyzing and researching big data enriches, broadens, and deepens policy and managerial implications. Scientific administration enables more accurate forecasting and prediction. In addition, performance evaluation and resource/budget allocation may gain more legitimacy due to data-based evidence.

2 - e-Government best practices & success factors


The excellence of Korean e-Government is recognized in international e-Government awards as well as international e-Government indices. The seven initiatives of the five Korean government institutions received the UN public service awards in 2011. Among them are the two initiatives of the MOPAS, the agency in charge of the overall Korean e-Government. The Information Network Village (INVIL) won the first place in the category of fostering participation in public policy-making decisions. The 24-Hour e-Services for the Public (Minwon24) won the second place in the category of improving the delivery of public services.

Figure 4 - e-Government in Korea : Best PracticesFigure 4

2.1 - e-Government in Korea : Best Practices


In addition, the level of Korea’s informatization is highly recognized by the world, as can be seen from the fact that Korea has ranked 1st for three consecutive years in ITU’s Digital Opportunity Index. The results of Korea’s e-Government services are selected as the best practices and their excellence is being acknowledged by the rest of the world. For example, with the e-Customs system called UNI-PASS that was established to complete an online export and import system for the first time in the world, Korea Customs Service won the WCO (World Customs Organization) Trophy in 2006 for intellectual property right protection with the fastest customs system among 169 member countries(MOGAHA, 2008).


Korea Online E-procurement System, or KONEPS, won the United Nations Public Service Award (PSA), and was selected by OECD as one of the best cases for improving transparency, and won the ‘Global IT Excellence Award’ from World Congress on Information Technology (WCIT) in 2006. Moreover, there have been an increasing number of developing countries that are planning to learn from Korea’s case by benchmarking it for their own respective countries. Achievements are also significant for other e-Government systems - Home Tax Service, an online tax service in Korea, was introduced as one of the best models by OECD and, the ‘e-People’ website for online participation of citizens was selected as one of the top 10 services for online politics in 2006 World e-Government Forum.

1 - Electronic procurement service (

  1. Overview : All procurement procedures are handled online, and a single window of procurement is open to improve efficiency and transparency of public procurement.

  2. Contents of services : All stages of procurement, such as bidding, awarding contracts, contracting, delivery, and payment, are handled online, and procurement progress can be monitored in real-time. All registered companies are enabled to participate in biddings of all public organizations, including national organizations, local government bodies, and public corporations, by a single registration in the G2B system.

2 - Electronic customs clearance service (

  1. Overview : Common use of information between logistics entities will be extended in order to improve and streamline export/import logistics business and processes as well as implementing a userfriendly batch logistics processing service.

  2. Contents of services : Export/import reports to the customs office and applications for inspection and quarantine to appropriate organizations are integrated to provide one-stop service. The conventional EDI system is upgraded to provide a more convenient, low-cost customs clearance service.

3 - Comprehensive tax services (

  1. Overview : Taxpayers can handle tax affairs online at home or work without visiting the tax office.

  2. Contents of services : All tax activities including filing, billing, and payment are processed online and information is retrieved anytime by taxpayer. Taxpayers or their tax agents can request and receive 18 civil affairs certificates.

4 - Internet civil services (

  1. Overview : People can use administrative services anytime, anywhere on the Internet.

  2. Contents of services : People can find services they need by searching through 5,300 services available and get detailed information. People can request up to 720 civil services online without visiting administrative offices and receive the results by regular mail. People can issue 28 civil affairs services documents online by themselves.

5 - Patent service (

  1. Overview : All patent services, such as patent application and progress check, are provided online.

  2. Contents of services : Procedures for patent application, review, and judgment as well as procedures for objection filings, and technical evaluations are publicly available online to provide 24/7 patent administration services. People can check and manage their patent and rights information efficiently. Services such as application for certificate issuance, verification and commission payment are provided online.

6 - e-People : Online Petition & Discussion Portal (

  1. Overview : Facilitate people s participation in policy-making by processing people s complaints and suggestions via a single window.

  2. Contents of services : People can provide their opinions on unfair administrative handling, infringements of their rights and interests, improvement of institutions, and various policies through an integrated online window. All administrative organizations are linked to the e-people window that receives and processes people s complaints and suggestions. In addition, at the same time people can check the results online.

7 - Single Window for Business Support Services (

  1. Overview : Provide a wide range of information and services to support companies business activities such as civil service information, policy information, and additional services via a single online window.

  2. Contents of services : Detailed information on 1,887 corporate services and industrial information contents of 205 organizations are provided in an integrated manner. Various additional services essential for corporate activities are provided by linking to the national backbone networks

8 - On-nara Business Process System (BPS)

  1. Overview : The On-nara BPS is a new business process management system that has increased the efficiency and transparency of administration by handling, recording and managing in a standardized way all the business procedures of the government online.

  2. Contents of services : All businesses of government are classified according to functionalities and goals, and business progress and performance are systematically managed down to the most basic unit task. Document creation and business procedures are standardized and decision making processes are recorded to ensure accountability and transparency of public administration

9 - Shared use of administrative information (

  1. Overview : Civil service officers can process civil service requests by checking the administration network without requiring the applicant to submit required documents.

  2. Contents of services : Seventy one documents required for verification will be checked by the person in charge of civil affairs by administrative information sharing. Information inquiry is only conducted with the consent of the applicants, and applicants can check information inquiry history anytime.

10 - National Computing & Information Agency (NCIA)

  1. Overview : Operate and manage all information systems of the government by integrating them into two data centers and provide non-interruptible administrative services by the best information technology and expertise.

  2. Contents of services : Back-up systems of the major infrastructure, state-of-the-art security facilities, and top-notch human resources ensure uninterrupted availability of e-Government services 24/7. Advanced information security and reliability are ensured by real-time monitoring of system errors.

2.2 - e-Government in Korea : Critical Success Factors


Generally, the success factors of e-Government are political, social, economical and industrial environment, political determination and leadership, vision and policy objective, project’s strategic priority, implementation system, human and financial resource distribution, cooperation among institutions, common framework, feedback, and learning (Song, 2002 ; Song at el., 2007). When organizing these factors from system perspective, the factors become environment, input (political determination and leadership, vision and policy objective, and project priority), transformation (implementation system, distribution of human, financial, and technical resources, and cooperative structure among institutions), output (performance), and feedback (feedback and learning). The CSFs are summarized as follows ;

1 - Strong Government Leadership

  • Leadership from the President

  • Strategic and sustainable plans for 20 years

  • Nationwide change management program

  • Aligned e-Government projects with Performance Evaluation

2 - Customer Oriented e-Government Services

  • Continuous Administrative Reform : Removal of overlapping function and process of Informatization, Streamlining of inconvenient Civil Services and Reduction of corruption

  • e-Government initiatives with the most potential to impact everyday lives of citizens such as resident registration, vehicle, customs clearance, employment, statistics management, etc… were given first priority, which became the foundation for e-Government

3 - Sustained Investment in e-Government Budget

  • 1% of the national budget was invested into e-Government construction every year

  • Created and utilized the Information and Telecommunication Promotion Fund to build early e-Government

4 - IT Governance

  • Established supervisory committees to drive e-Government directly under the President or Prime Minister

  • Made use of expert technical organizations : NIA, KISA, NIPA

  • Actively engaged the private sector including major Korean companies Enacted appropriate laws during each phase ensuring a positive enabling environment for e-Government

5 - Performance-based Program Management

  • Clear goals, objectives, short and longterm plans, with expected expenditure, income streams and deadlines

  • Qualitative, Quantitative Performance Index (KPI) for nationwide level and each project level

  • Designation of an officer or organizing body in charge of project performance

3 - e-Gov future directions


The paradigm for government has shifted from control and management to efficiency, transparency and participation through innovation, and the government’s function and citizens’ role in society has changed. Taken together, the future direction for e-Government needs to be considered and refined, based on government innovation undertaken by the each administration. The relationship between governments and citizens would be changed into that of partners, rather than a supplier-beneficiary relationship, and the government’s role also into a coordinator, rather than a governor. For this purpose, the government of the future requires four different factors : digitization, responsiveness, flexibility and governance. Digitization can be facilitated by the use of new technologies. Responsiveness means continuously seeking innovation performance, responding to rapid changes, and flexibility refers to accelerating and adapting to change. Finally governance contains the changes in the government’s role from a governor to a coordinator.


The future e-Government is being developed towards seamless and consolidated services, based on the e-Government projects that have been promoted so far. In addition, a new master plan for e-democracy where citizens can actively participate in policy-making and execution would also be necessary. The new e-Government strategies will be taken into account from various perspectives, especially in terms of strategy, e-Government services, citizens’ e-participation and strengthened infrastructure for e-Government.


On the strategic side of e-Government, it first should continuously evolve and develop, and its new value created. Service innovation and participation expansion, being the vision and goals of the each administration, should evolve and develop with trends over time, and administrative efficiency and increased transparency should be maintained as to achieve substantial performance. Second, e-Government and administrative innovation should be interconnected by a framework. Aiming at providing all government information and services via the Internet, electronic services should be developed in a wide range of areas including education, employment, medical care, government procurement, business service, social security, and tax ; and a close relationship between e-Government strategies and innovation is needed. Third, a performance evaluation system and feedback system on e-Government should be prepared. Goals should be clearly defined together with continuous motivation, and it is very important to establish and carry out systems that can maximize investment performance in connection with budget.


In terms of e-Government services, it is necessary, first, to step up accessibility to information. Using the customizable service functions of portals, users should be able to individualize government information and services as they wish, thereby achieving enhanced service convenience. Second, administrative work and the horizontal and vertical connection of e-Government systems should be consolidated. The services of each ministry must undergo process innovation from providing services on a 1 :1 relationship to seamless and integrated services on a 1 :n relationship, enabling continuous and batch processing.


Moreover, in order to establish services that citizens and businesses want, it is required to prepare consolidation principles and standards from a service perspective based on the government business reference model. More specific forms of business processes to provide integrated services will then be drawn up based on such principles and standards.


In order to strengthen citizen participation in e-Government, the expansion of online participation is required first. By actively and comprehensively disclosing various forms of information, which have been partially disclosed so far, all administrative information on policy-making should be open electronically, and transparent administrative services developed that can gain public understanding and validity. This is an ‘Open Government’ via e-Government. Second, it is required that citizen oriented e-Governance be established. By establishing an electronic path through which citizens and citizen groups can participate with responsibility and authority as partners on the same level as the government in policy-making procedures, e-democracy should be achieved to actively guarantee public participation. Also, a foundation should be built for e-governance, privacy protection, expansion of online participation in all the policy-making procedures, and improvement of electronic information welfare rights guaranteeing service quality.


An e-Government infrastructure should also be strengthened, and a government-wide information resource management system would be the first precedent. Since it is necessary to promote strategies that strengthen the interconnection between innovation and informatization, the advancement of e-Government requires active implementation of inter-ministerial policies such as diversifying policy information, expanding the sharing of administrative databases, and constructing and operating a knowledge management system. Following on, new information technologies such as ubiquitous, big data and cloud smart technology should be utilized.


In addition to developing these technologies, it is also necessary to close the digital divide and thoroughly attend to issues on fostering security. Especially, information security should be taken into consideration. In order to achieve an all-time accessible cloud computing environment, infrastructure should be first established with information security being taken into account. As the scale of informatization and the government’s dependence on informatized processes increase, it is urgent to seek measures to enhance business process continuity through prioritizing security in information systems and informatization infrastructure. With this achieved, it is necessary to strengthen the e-Government implementation framework.


In the end, the future e-Government will greatly enhance the reliability and transparency of the government, based on more efficient administration and improved service capacity for citizens. The people will be able to encounter an e-Government through which they can use government services and even participate in policy-making via diverse media anytime and anywhere.


  • ACCENTURE, 2001, e-Government Leadership : Rhetoric vs. Reality – Closing the Gap.
  • CHUNG C.-S., 2012, “The theory of electronic government” 3rd edition, Seoul : Seoul Economy and Business.
  • DELOITTE CONSULTING, 2001, e-Government’s Next Generation : Transforming the Government Enterprise through Customer Service.
  • GARTNER RESEARCH, 2002, The Gartner Framework for E-Government Strategy Assessment.
  • HWANG S.-D. et al., 2002, “Understanding of e-Government,” Seoul : Da-san Press.
  • INFORMATIZATION PROMOTION COMMITTEE, 2008, “National Informatization Basic Plan”.
  • MOPAS, 2008, “2008 White paper of Public Administration and Security,” Seoul : Samwoo total.
  • MOPAS, 2010a, “2009 White paper of Public Administration and Security,” Seoul : NW planning and information.
  • MOPAS, 2010b, “2010 White paper of Public Administration and Security,” Seoul : Neomia planning, 2010.
  • MOPAS, 2011, “Smart Gov Plan”.
  • NATIONAL AUDIT OFFICE (NAO), 2002, Better service through e-government : Case studies in Support of Better Public Services through egovernment. Australia.
  • NATIONAL COMPUTERIZATION AGENCY (NCA). (2002). E-Government in Korea. July, 2002. Korea.
  • NATIONAL PERFORMANCE REVIEW (NPR), 1997, Access America. Feb 3, 1997.
  • ORGANIZATION FOR ECONOMIC COOPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT (OECD), 2003, The e-Government Imperative. March, 2003.
  • OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET (OMB), 2001, E-Government Strategy. April, 2003.
  • PARK C.-G., SUH, S.-C., 2011, “A Study on Efficient Implementation of the e-Government in the Developing Countries,” Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial Cooperation Society, vol. 12, n° 9, p. 4169-4182.
  • SONG, H. I., 2002, “Prospects and Limitations of the E-Government Initiative in Korea”, International Review of Public Administration, vol.7, n°2, p.45-53. KAPA, Seoul, Korea.
  • SONG, H.-I., CHO T., 2007, “Electronic Government of Korea - Performance and Tasks,” Informatization Policy, vol. 14, n°4, p. 20-37.
  • SPECIAL COMMITTEE FOR E-GOVERNMENT (SCEG), 2003, White Paper : Korea’s E-Government : Completion of e-Government Framework, January 29, Korea.
  • THE MINISTRY OF INFORMATION & COMMUNICATION (MIC), 2002, Changing Korea with e-Government. December. Korea.
  • THE MINISTRY OF GOVERNMENT ADMINISTRATION AND HOME AFFAIRS (MOGAHA), 2003, Briefing document of e-Government Initiatives as the first anniversary. November. Korea.
  • THE MINISTRY OF GOVERNMENT ADMINISTRATION AND HOME AFFAIRS (MOGAHA), 2008, “e-Government Vision and Strategy : the way toward the 21st century e-Government”, Korea.
  • THE PRESIDENTIAL COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT INNOVATION AND DECENTRALIZATION (PCGID), (2003a), Participatory Government Vision and Direction of e-Government, May 6.
  • THE PRESIDENTIAL COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT INNOVATION AND DECENTRALIZATION (PCGID), 2003b, e-Government Roadmap of Participatory Government. Aug 14.
  • UNITED NATIONS (UN), 2002, Benchmarking E-Government : A Global Perspective Assessing the Progress of the UN Members.
  • UNITED NATIONS (UN), 2003, World Public Sector Report : E-Government at the Crossroads.
  • UNITED NATIONS (UN), 2005, Global E-Government Readiness Report 2005 : From E-Government to E-Inclusion.
  • UNITED NATIONS (UN), 2008, UN E-Government Survey 2008 : From E-Government to Connected Governance.
  • UNITED NATIONS (UN), 2010, UN E-Government Survey 2010 : Leveraging e-government at a time of financial and economic crisis.
  • UNITED NATIONS (UN), 2012, UN E-Government Survey 2012 : E-Government for the people.
  • UNITED NATIONS (UN), 2014, UN E-Government Survey 2014 : E-Government for the Future we want.



This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea Grant funded by the Korean Government (NRF-2014S1A3A2044645).


Professeur, Université de KyungSung, Corée du sud,


The main structure of the Special Committee for e-Government is based upon the committee’s working-level group which consists of civilians and directors of agencies. To support the working-level group, two working-level co-heads were appointed. One civilian and one high-level government officer (the presidential secretary of the Cheong Wa Dae Policy Planning Bureau) were appointed as co-heads.



The Korean e-Government began with the e-Government portal site ( on November 1, 2002. After going through continuous efforts in e-Government and national informatization, Korea has become one of the global e-Government leaders - obtaining the highest scores in ‘E-government Development Index’ and ‘E-participation Index’. In addition, many of Korea’s e-Government practices until now have been introduced to the world as the best cases and received worldwide acknowledgement.
The success factors of Korean e-Government are summarized as a strong political leadership, clear vision and policy objective, project’s strategic priority and human & financial resource distribution. The future e-Government is being developed towards seamless and consolidated services, based on the e-Government projects that have been promoted so far. The new e-Government strategies will be taken into account from various perspectives, especially in terms of strategy, e-Government services, citizens’ eparticipation and strengthened infrastructure for e-Government. The Korean e-Government is now progressing, however, it still has a long way to go to reach full interactive service delivery and government integration.


  • e-Government
  • Korea
  • development journey

Plan de l'article

  1. Introduction
  2. 1 - e-Government initiatives in Korean
    1. 1.1 - Kim, Dae-Jung Administration (Jan. 2001 – Feb. 2003)
      1. 1.1.1 - Vision & Strategy
      2. 1.1.2 - e-Government Initiatives
    2. 1.2 - Roh, Moo-Hyun Administration (Feb. 2003 - Feb. 2008)
      1. 1.2.1 - Vision & Strategy
      2. 1.2.2 - e-Government Initiatives
    3. 1.3 - Lee, Myung-Bak Administration (Feb. 2008 - Feb. 2013)
      1. 1.3.1 - Vision & Strategy
      2. 1.3.2 - e-Government Initiatives
    4. 1.4 - Park, Geun-Hye Administration (Feb. 2013 - Present)
      1. 1.4.1 - Vision & Strategy
      2. 1.4.2 - e-Government Initiatives (Government 3.0)
  3. 2 - e-Government best practices & success factors
    1. 2.1 - e-Government in Korea : Best Practices
      1. 1 - Electronic procurement service (
      2. 2 - Electronic customs clearance service (
      3. 3 - Comprehensive tax services (
      4. 4 - Internet civil services (
      5. 5 - Patent service (
      6. 6 - e-People : Online Petition & Discussion Portal (
      7. 7 - Single Window for Business Support Services (
      8. 8 - On-nara Business Process System (BPS)
      9. 9 - Shared use of administrative information (
      10. 10 - National Computing & Information Agency (NCIA)
    2. 2.2 - e-Government in Korea : Critical Success Factors
      1. 1 - Strong Government Leadership
      2. 2 - Customer Oriented e-Government Services
      3. 3 - Sustained Investment in e-Government Budget
      4. 4 - IT Governance
      5. 5 - Performance-based Program Management
  4. 3 - e-Gov future directions

Article précédent Pages 107 - 122
© 2010-2017