Revue internationale de droit pénal
érès

I.S.B.N.2-86586-990-3
638 pages

p. 121 à 157
doi: 10.3917/ridp.721.0121

Veille sur la revue
Veille sur l'auteur
Vous consultez

Vol. 72 2001/1-2

England and Wales report

Michael Zander qc
I. In what situations is there lay participation ?
II. Composition of the court
III. The role of the lay judges in the taking of evidence
IV. Which factual and legal questions must the lay judges decide and how are they formulated ?
Jury cases
Magistrates’ courts
V. Deliberation and deciding questions of fact, law and guilt
VI. The decision
The jury’s verdict
The magistrates’ decision
VII. The appeal
No appeal against an acquittal
Statutory grounds of appeal
Court of Appeal’s approach to appeals on the ground that the jury got it wrong
Jury nullification as a ground of appeal
Fresh evidence
Retrials
Harmless error
How many appeals ?
VIII. Circumventing the jurisdiction of the lay court
Plea bargaining
IX. Who are the lay judges and how are they selected ?
The Jury
Those ineligible, disqualified or excused
Jury selection
Participation of the parties in the selection of the jury
Financial compensation for jurors
Who serves on juries ?
X. A brief history of lay participation in the criminal trial
The jury :
• XI. Empirical studies of the effectiveness of lay participation in the country
Summary of results
The Crown Court Study
XII. Criticism of lay participation
XIII. Reform proposals
The issues currently under discussion are :


© Cairn 2007 Vie privée | Conditions d’utilisation | Conditions générales de vente
À propos | Éditeurs | Bibliothèques | Aide à la navigation | Plan du site | Raccourcis