Cairn - Lay participation in Norway

Mon compte |

Mon panier d'achats |

Ma bibliographie

Contacts |

Aide

· Accès distant · Mot de passe oublié

· Recherche avancée

Revue internationale de droit pénal
érès

I.S.B.N.2-86586-990-3
638 pages

p. 225 à 251
doi: 10.3917/ridp.721.0225

Veille sur la revue
Veille sur l'auteur

S'abonner à la revue

Vous consultez

Vol. 72 2001/1-2

Discipline > Revue > Sommaire > Résumé

Télécharger cet article en PDF

Lay participation in Norway

Asbjørn Strandbakken

Plan de l'article

• Introduction

• 2. General rules of the Criminal Trial

— 2.1. The adversary system

— 2.2. Role of the aggrieved person

— 2.3. The principle of oral proceedings

— 2.4. The principle of immediacy

— 2.5. The principle of hearing both sides of a case

— 2.6. The principle of free evaluation of the evidence

— 2.7. The duty of the courts to clarify the facts of the case

— 2.8. The institute of plea bargaining

• 3. Lay participation in the courts at first instance

— 3.1. Introduction

— 3.2. Rights of the lay judges

— 3.3. Role of the lay judges during the hearing

— 3.4. Deliberations on the questions of guilt and sentencing

— 3.5. The judgment

• 4. Lay participation in the Court of Appeal

— 4.1. Introduction

— 4.2. Limitations on the right to appeal

— 4.3. Non-participation of lay judges

— 4.4. Mixed courts

— 4.5. Jury trial

— Appeal to the Supreme Court

• 6. The selection of lay judges

— 6.1. Introduction

— 6.2. Nomination of prospective lay judges

— 6.3. Selection of lay judges for a specific trial

• 8. Criticism of lay participation and reform proposals

— 8.1. Introduction

— 8.2. The legal tradition as an independent argument

— 8.3. The value of professional and lay judge co-operation

— 8.4. The value of stated reasons for the verdict

— 8.5. Jury trials as more complicated, expensive and time consuming

— 8.6. The jury as a possible safeguard against unjustified convictions

— 8.7. Conclusion

• BIBLIOGRAPHY

Texte intégral de l'article Télécharger cet article en PDF