Revue internationale de droit pénal
érès

I.S.B.N.2-86586-990-3
638 pages

p. 559 à 577
doi: 10.3917/ridp.721.0559

Veille sur la revue
Veille sur l'auteur
Vous consultez

Vol. 72 2001/1-2

The presumption of innocence and the cour d’assises : is France ready for adversarial procedure ?

Michel Bonnieu
I. Introduction
II. General Organisation of the Cour d’assises.
2.1 Seat of the Cour d’Assises
2.2 Principle of unity.
2.3 Venue of sessions.
2.4 Opening of sessions.
III. Professional Judges and Lay Participation in the Cour d’assiseS.
3.1 Presidency of the Cour d’Assises.
3.2 Professional assessors.
3.3 Lay assessors.
3.4 Number of lay assessors.
3.5 Jurisdiction of lay assessors.
3.6 Rights and obligations of lay assessors during the proceedings.
IV. Proceedings Before the Cour d’assises.
4.1 Principle of oral proceedings
4.2 Principle of public hearing
4.3 Principle of intime conviction.
4.4 Lay judges and hearings.
4.5 Questions put to the jury.
4.6 Voting procedures.
V. Presumption of Innocence Throughout Criminal Proceedings
5.1 Introduction.
5.2. Recommendations strengthening the rights of the defendant.
5.3 Recommendations reforming pretrial detention.
5.4 Recommendations concerning length of proceedings.
5.5 Recommendations concerning communication with the media.
VI. Criticism of the Cour d’assises.
6.1 Brief history of the Cour d’Assises
— 6.2 Appeal to the Cour de cassation.
6.3 Procedural rules regulating criminal trials.
6.4 Length of proceedings
6.5 No reasons given in the decision
VII. What Will Lay Participation in the Criminal Trial Be Like in France in the 21st Century ?
7.1 Introduction
7.2 Why a reform for the Cour d’Assises ?
7.3 What reform for the Cour d’Assises ?
VIII. Conclusion
• SOURCES


© Cairn 2007 Vie privée | Conditions d’utilisation | Conditions générales de vente
À propos | Éditeurs | Bibliothèques | Aide à la navigation | Plan du site | Raccourcis