• List of Relating Hungarian Acts
• Definitions in the Hungarian legal system
• I - Justification of the Principle
— I. 1. Is the principle announced in an explicit manner by a legal text ? When
necessary, has the jurisprudence helped to complete the legislative
dispositions or filled the silence of the law ?
— I. 2. Is the principle based on classical legal reasoning (imputability/guilt) or is it based more on a criminological concept of « criminal capacity »?
— I. 3. Are there existing doctrinal or legislative tendencies which, if necessary, aim at giving the responsibility of minors a specific justification ?
— I. 4. Does a specific concept of « juvenile crime » exist which is independent
of the principle of criminal responsibility; and, if so, for what types of acts ?
— I. 5. Does a tendency exist to exclude minors from benefiting from the
juvenile justice system for the sake of treating them as adults for certain
crimes that are particularly serious (for example : acts of terrorism, rape…)?
— I. 6. Do dispositions (civil or criminal) exist which favour the responsibility of parents for the delinquent behaviour of their children who are not of age
based on the notion of objective responsibility ?
• II - The Question of Different Categories of Age
— II. 1. What is the age of criminal majority ? Has this age been recently
modified ? Are there existing tendencies to increase or lower this age ? For
what reasons ?
— II. 2. Is there a minimum level under which the minor can not be punished or
receive educational measures for the crime he/she has committed ? If so,
does this level consist of a chronological age or can it vary according to the
subject ? In this latter case, what is the criterion (legal, psychological…)
which determines this level ?
— II. 3. Do there exist specific categories that benefit from a particular regime ?
What measures are possible in the case of an child committing a crime ?
— II. 4. Are there specific dispositions that apply to the category « young
adults »? If so, up to what age can a subject be considered a part of this
special regime ?
• III - Judicial Establishment of Criminal Responsibility of Minors
• III. Introduction
— III. 1. Are there special jurisdictions competent to judge minors who commit
crime ? When these jurisdictions exist, to what extent do they use juries or
have members of other professions sit with the professional judges ?
Specify the composition of these jurisdictions.
— III. 2. How is the responsibility/irresponsibility of the minor established
judicially ? Does the jury or do the non professional judges take part in
pronouncing the minor guilty or not guilty ?
— III. 3. Does the court have recourse to prior investigations, obligatory or
optional (expertise, medico-psychological examination, personality study),
before ruling on the question of the responsibility of the minor ?
— III. 4. Are there two distinct stages, one deciding the question of the minor’s
guilt (conviction stage) and the other pronouncing the sanction (sentencing
stage)?
— III. 5.1. Briefly describe the role of the victim when the crime is committed by
a minor.
— III. 5.2. Can the victim initiate the action ?
— III. 5.3. Is the victim allowed to ask for reparation before the jurisdiction that
judges the minor’s responsibility ? Can the victim obtain reparation even if
the minor is considered irresponsible ? Before what court (civil or criminal)?
Finally, do alternative procedures (of the mediation-reparation type) exist ?
• IV - Sanctions and Measures Applicable
• IV. Introduction
— 1. Educative measures without deprivation of liberty
— 2. Penalties without deprivation of liberty
— 3. Measures involving deprivation of liberty
— 4. Penalty involving deprivation of liberty
— IV. 1. What measures can be applied to minors before judgement
(provisional detention, judicial supervision, constraining measures and/or
educative measures)?
— IV. 2. If the minor is judged responsible, does the court have a choice
between pronouncing a punishment or an educational measure, or does it have no choice ?
— IV. 3. What is the general tendency concerning specific measures applicable
to minors ?
— IV. 4. Do legal criteria for determining the sanction exist ?
— IV. 5. Does the court possess the means to moderate the punishment or to
allow for a more flexible execution of the sanction ?
— IV. 6. Does the execution of the sanction have any particular supervision and
according to which modalities ?
— IV. 7. Does a tendency exist which favors the decriminalisation of juvenile
justice ? Is this tendency based on the dissociation of the responsibility and
the sanction ?
— IV. 8. Can capital punishment be pronounced in the case of a juvenile, and if so at what age ?
— IV. 9. Does the punishment of life imprisonment or for an indeterminate time
exist ?
• V - International Aspects
— V. 1. What are, briefly enumerated, the relevant dispositions in international
law, having an incidence on the determination of the criminal responsibility
of minors ?
— V. 2. What authority do these dispositions have vis-à-vis national sources ?
— V. 3. Do they have a real influence in positive law ?
— V. 4. Do particular dispositions exist concerning the criminal responsibility
of foreign minors ? How, for example, can one determine the age of a minor
in the absence of official documents that attest the alleged age ?
— V. 5. Do special dispositions concerning police, judicial and penitentiary co-operation exist that apply to minors who are in a criminal procedure ?
•