Revue internationale de droit pénal
érès

I.S.B.N.2-7492-0384-8
660 pages

p. 379 à 399
doi: 10.3917/ridp.751.0379

Veille sur la revue
Veille sur l'auteur
Vous consultez

Rapports nationaux

Vol. 75 2004/1-2

Hungary criminal responsibility of minors in national and international legal order

Dr Kristina KARSAY
• List of Relating Hungarian Acts
Definitions in the Hungarian legal system
I - Justification of the Principle
I. 1. Is the principle announced in an explicit manner by a legal text ? When necessary, has the jurisprudence helped to complete the legislative dispositions or filled the silence of the law ?
— I. 2. Is the principle based on classical legal reasoning (imputability/guilt) or is it based more on a criminological concept of « criminal capacity »?
— I. 3. Are there existing doctrinal or legislative tendencies which, if necessary, aim at giving the responsibility of minors a specific justification ?
I. 4. Does a specific concept of « juvenile crime » exist which is independent of the principle of criminal responsibility; and, if so, for what types of acts ?
I. 5. Does a tendency exist to exclude minors from benefiting from the juvenile justice system for the sake of treating them as adults for certain crimes that are particularly serious (for example : acts of terrorism, rape…)?
I. 6. Do dispositions (civil or criminal) exist which favour the responsibility of parents for the delinquent behaviour of their children who are not of age based on the notion of objective responsibility ?
• II - The Question of Different Categories of Age
II. 1. What is the age of criminal majority ? Has this age been recently modified ? Are there existing tendencies to increase or lower this age ? For what reasons ?
II. 2. Is there a minimum level under which the minor can not be punished or receive educational measures for the crime he/she has committed ? If so, does this level consist of a chronological age or can it vary according to the subject ? In this latter case, what is the criterion (legal, psychological…) which determines this level ?
II. 3. Do there exist specific categories that benefit from a particular regime ? What measures are possible in the case of an child committing a crime ?
— II. 4. Are there specific dispositions that apply to the category « young adults »? If so, up to what age can a subject be considered a part of this special regime ?
III - Judicial Establishment of Criminal Responsibility of Minors
III. Introduction
III. 1. Are there special jurisdictions competent to judge minors who commit crime ? When these jurisdictions exist, to what extent do they use juries or have members of other professions sit with the professional judges ? Specify the composition of these jurisdictions.
III. 2. How is the responsibility/irresponsibility of the minor established judicially ? Does the jury or do the non professional judges take part in pronouncing the minor guilty or not guilty ?
— III. 3. Does the court have recourse to prior investigations, obligatory or optional (expertise, medico-psychological examination, personality study), before ruling on the question of the responsibility of the minor ?
— III. 4. Are there two distinct stages, one deciding the question of the minor’s guilt (conviction stage) and the other pronouncing the sanction (sentencing stage)?
III. 5.1. Briefly describe the role of the victim when the crime is committed by a minor.
III. 5.2. Can the victim initiate the action ?
III. 5.3. Is the victim allowed to ask for reparation before the jurisdiction that judges the minor’s responsibility ? Can the victim obtain reparation even if the minor is considered irresponsible ? Before what court (civil or criminal)? Finally, do alternative procedures (of the mediation-reparation type) exist ?
IV - Sanctions and Measures Applicable
IV. Introduction
1. Educative measures without deprivation of liberty
2. Penalties without deprivation of liberty
3. Measures involving deprivation of liberty
4. Penalty involving deprivation of liberty
IV. 1. What measures can be applied to minors before judgement (provisional detention, judicial supervision, constraining measures and/or educative measures)?
— IV. 2. If the minor is judged responsible, does the court have a choice between pronouncing a punishment or an educational measure, or does it have no choice ?
IV. 3. What is the general tendency concerning specific measures applicable to minors ?
IV. 4. Do legal criteria for determining the sanction exist ?
IV. 5. Does the court possess the means to moderate the punishment or to allow for a more flexible execution of the sanction ?
IV. 6. Does the execution of the sanction have any particular supervision and according to which modalities ?
IV. 7. Does a tendency exist which favors the decriminalisation of juvenile justice ? Is this tendency based on the dissociation of the responsibility and the sanction ?
— IV. 8. Can capital punishment be pronounced in the case of a juvenile, and if so at what age ?
IV. 9. Does the punishment of life imprisonment or for an indeterminate time exist ?
V - International Aspects
V. 1. What are, briefly enumerated, the relevant dispositions in international law, having an incidence on the determination of the criminal responsibility of minors ?
V. 2. What authority do these dispositions have vis-à-vis national sources ?
V. 3. Do they have a real influence in positive law ?
V. 4. Do particular dispositions exist concerning the criminal responsibility of foreign minors ? How, for example, can one determine the age of a minor in the absence of official documents that attest the alleged age ?
— V. 5. Do special dispositions concerning police, judicial and penitentiary co-operation exist that apply to minors who are in a criminal procedure ?


© Cairn 2007 Vie privée | Conditions d’utilisation | Conditions générales de vente
À propos | Éditeurs | Bibliothèques | Aide à la navigation | Plan du site | Raccourcis